I think it encompasses everything that makes us unique individuals in
identity and in being different in every single way in features and
cultures.
American society (and I don't know what to say about multicultural
societies in the rest of the Americas -- i.e. the Caribbean islands,
Brazil, and Latin America -- whose populations also consist largely of
people of mixed heritages) has created a cut-cold definition of what being
a mixed person really is. This society in which we live has also defined
for too long what being a mixed, multicultural person is not. From my
vantage point, this society has defined a "mixed" person as being the
product of one monoracial "white" parent and one monoracial "black" parent. It left out all the in-betweens who are simultaneously "black"/"white" yet not first generation mixies, as
well as people of other racial and ethnic backgrounds who are just as
capable of contributing to a diversely mixed gene pool as can one "white"
person and one "black" person.
I'm looking at the subject matter from this standpoint because this is
how I see my own "mixed/multiracial" experience. I don't have the
strongest arguments to fire off at everyone, because, from a
multigenerational mixed person's standpoint, I haven't been affected as
deeply with this issue as surely, many, if not all of you have been all of
your lives. The reason why I, as well as many multigenerational mixies, haven't been affected with the issue of being
accepted/rejected and defined by others is because of the curse of the
one-drop rule. The one-drop rule in all of its power has defined
me and other multigenerational mixies as a sum of one -- and not all the
rest. It has ruled out our being recognized and respected for
everything that we are, just because many of us have inherited
African features/genes/heritages that appear to be what some in this society
imply is "undesirable." This is why I replied
in one Point-Counterpoint question -- Does the One-Drop Rule Go Both Ways?
-- "Why would it/can it not go both ways?"
For a multigenerational mixie, I say that the way to fight and destroy the
one-drop of 'black' blood rule that has fought all persons of partial African
ancestry is to accept everything you are as a whole, even if you cannot see
the other parts of your ancestry when you look at yourself in the mirror.
Also, make everyone else around you know that hypodescent or the one-drop rule
does not apply to you. Who are they to decide what you are and aren't? My
features sure won't answer this question for them or justify their "powers
that be" and "racism-given right" to identify me!
In the past, I labeled myself a "black-identified mulatta," not because I
chose to ignore the "white" side of me that has always been there, but
because I just wasn't so sure then about what I am and who all made me what I am. At some point, though, I sought to know all of who I am. I went through the trouble to do extensive research on both sides of my family backgrounds. I was lucky to discover some rare sources of information that shed brilliant light on everything I am.
I have been blessed in a way few can ever know to have
learned in depth about all those ancestors who contributed to the face I
see in the mirror everyday. And even though it may not "seem" this way to
those who see me out in the world everyday, approximately half of me is European, approximately half of
me is African, and there is even some of me that is Native American. And so
were my parents and their parents before them, who had parents before them
that, once upon a time, fit this narrow-minded society's current definition
of what being "multiracial," "bi-racial," "mulatto" or whatever you want
to call it, is and isn't. In conclusion, I'm now just one "all-identified
mulatta."
I'm going to speak from another angle on the subject of being multiracial.
What is being multiracial about? What is being multiracial "not" about?
|
|
|
©2001 all rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part prohibited without
the express written consent of Interracial Voice.