In most societies the scale of female desirability is
primarily determined by what the men as a group perceive
as most feminine or most attractive (take a look at those
women’s magazine polls of male opinion that come out from
time to time). Note that the word is “feminine” rather than
“beautiful.” Some reports state that because the majority of Asian women are
considered petite by most American men they are therefore perceived as more
feminine than “white,” “Latino,” or “black” women. Apparently certain Afro-American
women aren’t aware that “white” women have dropped to second place on the
attractiveness scale.
African American women often disparage “white” women’s supposedly
anorectic figures and claim that due to “heredity” African American women have
“shape” and can’t achieve “fashion model” looks. Does “shape” refer to the
characteristic gluteus maximus, or to the widespread tendency to be just plain
overweight? There is nothing about “shape” that healthier food choices and regular
aerobic exercise couldn’t vastly improve. “Shape” sounds like an excuse, and if
anyone else touted that heredity business about them they’d immediately label that
person a racist. Apparently, Afro-American women also don’t know that the average
female in the U.S. wears size 12 not size 6, nor have they noticed that the natural
petiteness of many Asian American women is considered more appealing than the
unnatural, starved model look they so abhor.
Another argument that’s received a lot of attention is that Afro-American
women are supposedly victims of “Eurocentric” beauty standards and therefore
cannot hope to compete against Euro-American women in the looks department. If
that’s true then how did Iman and Naomi Campbell, for example, become two of the
richest and most famous models in the world? Many people consider them beautiful
but I certainly wouldn’t call their looks “Eurocentric.” A further flaw in this argument
is that studies have shown that the most marriageable women in the U.S. these
days are “Asian” not Euro- American and that the men they are marrying are
primarily “white.” It seems therefore that “white” women have just as much to
complain about as “black” ones do about “their” men being “stolen.” Are they
whining about heredity or about being taller or more mesomorphic than Asian
women? No, they’re out there looking for other fish to fry.
While Asian (Japanese, Korean, Chinese, Indian, Thai, etc.) women may share
a much-vaunted Eurocentric “beauty mark” -- i.e. long, straight hair -- they run the
gamut of skin color, tend to be small busted, don’t as a rule have blue, grey, or
green eyes, and plenty of them have broad noses and thick lips. So, what then
accounts for so many Afro-American women being perceived as least feminine and
therefore least attractive? Hold that thought for a moment.
The average U.S. male (of unspecified color/“race”) does not get to meet Iman
or Naomi Campbell, and after all, they are known primarily from still photos.
Rather, the U.S. male sees and hears the animate characters and caricatures that
Afro-American women portray in film and on TV; he sees the ones that appear all
too frequently as guests on the horridly popular scandal shows; and he sees the
ones that make themselves all too negatively noticeable in public places. And what
is the most prominent image being projected? An in-your-face, hostile and
aggressive, neck undulating, head bobbing, strident, finger pointing, often overly
made up, poorly or inappropriately dressed “vision of loveliness” with an improbable
hair color, 4-inch curved talons for fingernails, and who only speaks jive/Ebonics. Is
this picture feminine, attractive, or desirable?
Since for the most part U.S. communities are still primarily divided along
economic and caste (“racial”) lines, their members do not largely live and play in
the same areas. The average “non-black” male isn’t likely to see or meet
Afro-American women that contradict this negative image that’s being projected in
visual media. Who is ultimately responsible for the perpetuation of this image? Why
is this image being projected in the first place? Why aren’t middle and upper class
Afro-American women who don’t fit this lower and underclass stereotype doing
something to change it? Why would any group of people project their worst
examples as representative of the whole or as role models? Why would a group of
people that frequently and loudly complains about negative stereotypes not
complain about this one? Could it be an excuse?
Hardly any woman can achieve “fashion model” looks. Few women are
considered “beautiful” or even “pretty.” All American women are tyrannized by
impossible standards of youth, beauty, and the blonde syndrome. However, many,
many women are in fact, or potentially, attractive. They are not beautiful or pretty
but they are attractive because they are feminine. Femininity (or masculinity for
that matter) is largely a state of mind. If a girl grows up being told that she’s pretty
she believes it regardless of whether or not it’s actually true. And believing it, she
acts it out. The reverse is also true. If she’s unfortunate enough to fall into the latter
group then she’s stuck with doing the work it takes to change her self-image and
self-esteem. Regardless of who was responsible for her negative feelings about her
appearance she is still the one who has to do the hard work of changing her mind,
her feelings, and herself.
I know for a fact, having watched men watching women, that Afro-American
men are not the only men physically attracted to Afro-American women. I also
don’t doubt for a moment, however, that many, many men (including “black” ones) are
extremely turned off by the way a lot of African American women behave. The
crassly sexual, materially grasping, verbally vulgar harpy is equally unappealing to
all men and doubly off-putting to men from backgrounds different from hers who
don’t share her frame of reference. That is, they don’t understand “where she is
coming from” with such a self-presentation. I rarely see “white,” “Asian,” or
“Hispanic” men with an Afro-American woman, but when I do, the individual woman
is altogether different from what I’ve just described.
“White” is not synonymous with beauty, nor is “black” with ugly. But if “black”
is perceived as ugly it’s because poor taste, bad manners, and being loud and
crude with a chip on one’s shoulder ARE ugly. Until Afro-American women of this
type truly believe “Black is Beautiful” few others are ever going to believe it either.
That they don’t believe it is obvious, it shows. It shows in how they dress, behave,
and carry themselves in public. Another dead giveaway is the number of “white”/“black” mixed
actresses and models who are promoted to the general public as “black.” If these
actresses and models didn’t exist who would the Afro-American community be
pointing to as examples of “black” beauty instead? Pretending that Afro-American
women and Creole/Mulatto women look the same is about as believable as when
some of the Asian teenagers I see these days dye their hair red or blonde and wear
blue contact lenses.
This type of Afro-American woman should quit whining about Afrocentric
features vs. European beauty standards. She should “chill” that “badittude.” She
should stop blaming others and stop trying to turn faults into desirable qualities.
Stop using heredity as an excuse to continue separating herself from mainstream
culture and society. She should wear clothes that fit. Wear styles that flatter. Guess
what? Bo Derek, “the perfect 10”? Cornrows weren’t becoming to her, either.
As a multigenerational triracial woman I have no sympathy for Afro-American
women. After all, they and Euro-American women have stolen all the viable,
available, attractive Creole/Mulatto men.
As a result of recent articles, essays, comments, and
discussions I’ve read or heard in various media, as well as on
the basis of “field observations,” I decided to consolidate what
I’ve learned and formally address this topic. After due
consideration, I’ve developed an explanation that no doubt will
not be at all popular with the subject group -- self-identified
African American women in the U.S. of a certain caste, class,
and type.
|
|
|
©2000 all rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part prohibited without
the express written consent of Interracial Voice.