If Clinton is concerned about whether race makes a difference, all
he needs to do is to step back a moment and review his own actions as
our leader five years ago when the Rwanda mess started and his
actions today on the Yugoslavia mess.
In both situations major ethnic groups had a many generations deep
belief and grievances against the other. They also had a many
generations long history of coexistence marred by periods of bitter
and deadly ethnic clashes.
Grievances between groups that span generations bury themselves deep
within the psyche of the group and, like strongly held religious
beliefs, can lead to group actions that seems illogical to outsiders
but quite logical when passed through the filter of those grievances
and beliefs orally passed from generation to generation.
Maybe if Clinton and his advisors had passed that Yugoslavia
situation through the prism of their own generational beliefs they
would have realized that our most powerful weapon -- our unmatched
ability to deliver bombs of all types and sizes from air or water -- is
unsuited to stop that ethnic-belief led drive to remove a
generationally hated group from their area.
Those illogical generational held beliefs are problems all over this
world, even in this country. That's why race makes such a difference
right here.
And that's why the Clinton administration and most of white America
was stirred by television pictures of atrocities in white Yugoslavia
and were relatively unmoved by television pictures of an order of
magnitude greater atrocity level in black Africa.
Knowing the depth of the black-white divide in this country that
still exists even though effort to close that gap has been made, I'm
sure very few of us thought for one moment that the Clinton
administration would have viewed the Rwanda situation with the
gravity they view the clashes between whites, whether in Ireland or
in the Balkans.
We know that race makes a difference in this country. And we know
that those long held illogical beliefs don't disappear simply because
the president wishes that they disappear.
I'm sure the Clinton administration and its advisors know that too.
And it also applies to the Balkan ethnic problems.
That's why it seems illogical to me that the administration would
have expected Yugoslav President Milosevic to tuck in his tail and
run simply because a U. S. backed group would rain a few bombs on the
country. That's not in their history.
Hitler found out that those ethnic clans in Yugoslavia were no
pushovers. Over twenty Nazi divisions couldn't subdue those people on
their own territory. And those Nazis were not trying to spare
civilians or anyone else.
With that kind of relatively recent history, why would anyone expect
them to be awed by some bombs that everyone knew, including the
bomber crews, were not going to wreak havoc on civilian areas?
Delivering bombs from the air won't stop one ethnic group with
cleansing their area by the use of hand guns and knives for slitting
throats. Those actions can stopped.
But, the price of stopping them is high. It takes better armed and
determined troops on the ground to provide protection and immediate
retribution on those who pull such acts.
That's basic. However, in those kind of cases, there is an old rule
that applies whether on the street between individuals or in areas
between groups -- "You have to bring ass to get ass."
And that is where the rub comes when it comes to stopping those deep
rooted ethnic conflicts that are becoming more deadly because of the
proliferation of deadly arms of all kinds all over this world.
Without arms made in industrial countries and sold everywhere, those
ethnic battles would still occur but without the deadly automatic
weapons, the death toll wouldn't be as great.
Stopping or controlling those clashes then would be easier for the
major countries if the small arms available was tilted heavily in
favor of those trying to stop the conflict. In those kind of cases,
it would "take less ass to get ass."
The Clinton administration's real problem in dealing with those low
intensity battles within countries with warring ethnic groups is that
they know we don't think stopping the carnage is worth spending the
lives of our young people.
Think about it. Some of us were concerned that the administration
didn't do more to stop the carnage in Rwanda. But, there were very
few of us that would have supported putting some of our own young
people in harm's way to stop that mess on the ground.
Even though there is a lot of pressure on the administration to stop
that mess in Yugoslavia, there is almost no pressure on the
administration to send some of our young people there to provide that
ground action that is needed to stop the ethnic cleansing that goes
on.
It is almost too late now to stop it -- they have almost finished their
cleansing exercise. The problem now is what to do about the refugees.
Clinton wants them all to go back. That makes no sense unless the
U. S and its allies will have troops on the ground to give them
day-to-day protection. In street language, it is another case of
President Clinton letting "his mouth overload his ass."
Let me hear from you: (916) 988-4439 (V); (916) 988-5928 (FAX); e-mail;
eccurtis@email.com. To see back
columns http://home.earthlink.net/~gacurtis
|
|
|
©1998 all rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part prohibited without
the express written consent of Interracial Voice.
![]()