July 14, 1999
Undoubtedly, I'm looking at our problems through a different prism from the
NAACP's leadership. It's incredulous to me that the NAACP's leadership
chose having a black actor or actress as the lead in a TV show as the
paramount issue to fight today.
Whether they meant it or not, that's the impression that is left on the
public's mind when the President and CEO's keynote address to its 90th
annual convention was used to attack the four major networks for not having
some black leads in the new prime time TV shows.
Sure, we ought to have more black faces on TV. But, is that anywhere near
as important to our future as having fewer of our youngsters in the lower
academic echelons in schools?
Of course not. We can survive and survive well without black faces in
leading roles on prime time TV but, on the other hand, we can't survive well
in a knowledge-based economy if we don't make drastic improvements in the
academic achievements of our youngsters.
Over the years I have watched the statistics on academic performance in
local schools in many areas as they get published in the major daily
newspaper of the area. There is a commonality in those scores.
Almost without exception, the schools with the lowest academic performance
have the highest percentage enrollment of African American, Hispanics or a
combination of both. In this competitive knowledge-based economy, that
spells disaster.
Make no mistake about it -- things will get worse for us, as a group, if we
don't better the education system for our youngsters.
Over the past fourteen years in California applicants for teaching
credentials have had to pass a screening test, California Basic Educational
Skills Test, commonly called CBEST. It is an 8th to 10th-grade test, at
best.
It tests applicants in basic reading, writing and arithmetic. From the
samples I have seen of that test, I don't want anyone teaching my
grandchildren at any level who couldn't pass CBEST. Frankly, a fair
ninth-grader should cool it.
In my view, the CBEST stats show a horrendous failure rate on first try for
all applicants. For instance, about one out of five whites flunk, about
one-half of the Latinos (51 percent) and Asians (47 percent) don't make it,
and almost two out of three (62 percent) African American college graduates
fall by the wayside.
The results of the CBEST tests show that unless our youngsters basic
education improves, we are even going to be squeezed out of our largest
source of professional employment, the public education system.
As for the technical fields that are the dominant underpinnings of a
knowledge-based economy, we have always been few and far between. It looks
like now we are even fewer and farther between.
Of all of the problems we face as a group -- racism, driving while black,
undercover job discrimination, redlining, etc. -- our lagging in academic
achievement is the most serious for the immediate and longterm future.
That problem doesn't just start at the college level. It starts in the
first three or four grades in school. Those lagging behind a grade or two
by the fifth or sixth grade (which many are), are almost sure losers in the
academic and legitimate economic survival race.
Furthermore, we don't just face that problem in San Francisco, Sacramento,
Long Beach, Houston or Miami or wherever you are when you read this
column. It's a problem all over the country.
That's why I'm so disappointed with the NAACP placing a black face or two in
a leading role on a TV program on the "A" list of our problems. The NAACP's
history is one of focusing on our key problems.
When we have real problems, we expect to find the NAACP involved in trying
to solve that problem. It certainly should be clear to all of us that our
laggard status in terms of education in this country is a real problem for
us.
I'm sure the NAACP leadership knows those facts. Make no mistake about it,
as a group, the NAACP leaders are a very smart group. However, I think they
have a problems in deciding how to bring the education problem to the fore.
Many of their key members are education professionals.
And if the NAACP focuses on the failure to educate our children, they will
be pointing a serious finger at themselves because the failure can be laid
at the feet of our own professionals in that field.
Public school systems that are failing with our youngsters are usually well
sprinkled with black teachers, principals and administrators. And if the
NAACP leaders really attack that system, they would be attacking themselves,
their own leaders and members.
Frankly, they ought to bite the bullet and take the lead for change rather
than delegate the turmoil now going on about public education to the "B" or
even "C" list of our problems. We need a strong debate in our own
communities about what should be done to change the present education
system.
The public education system is doing such a disservice to our youngsters
that keeping the status quo ought to be out of question; drastic changes are
needed.
The ones that seem to worry the most about the education of our youngsters
are mothers and grandmothers. I think intuitively they know that if the
schools don't reach their young boys, they are only raising them to be
jail bait, at best.
Let me hear from you: (916)492-9527 (V); (916)492-9146 (FAX); e-mail;
eccurtis@hotmail.com. To see back columns
http://home.earthlink.net/~eccurtis
|
|
|
©1999 all rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part prohibited without
the express written consent of Interracial Voice.
![]()