Interracial-Voice
Guest Editorial

Eyeballing Made (un) Easy
By William Javier Nelson

W.J. Nelson This past March, while I was watching the NCAA tournament, I saw a young man playing gracefully and effortlessly in the paint. The back of his jersey had a Jewish name on it, and the player himself had hair whose curls were a bit tighter than mine. To complete the picture, the guy was a little bit darker than olive in complexion.

I was about the turn the television off at that point because it looked as though his team was about to lose the game and we had guests over for dinner who didn't get into sports. But then I delayed, because his presence on the screen pointed to something that we are going to have to get used to a heck of a lot more:

People Who Are More Difficult To Eyeball.

What "race" was that guy? For that matter, what was his ethnicity?

More and more we are going to encounter people who will make the eyeballers cringe, because more and more we are producing folks who are the products of intermixtures. This, coupled with the tremendous influx of folks who are coming to this country from Abunowe (Anywhere-But-North-West-Europe), is bursting through the brain-cells of dichotomous-thinking North Americans raised on "black"/"white"/One Drop.

So far, of course, there are vast (and I mean VAST) areas of the U.S. where the population is still a haven for eyeballers who like to guess rightly one's "race":

Large areas of the rural Midwest
Huge tracts in the South

However, in other parts of the country, there is a creeping progression of more and more people who are more difficult to eyeball. People that it might be prudent to "hold tight" before putting one's foot in one's mouth and making the wrong assumption about what they are.

It's making me positively gleeful.

I mean, the ambiguity is everywhere! Just last fall, I was on a Southwest Airlines flight sitting alongside a guy with low-riding trousers and dark-brown-skinned/kinky-haired features. About 200 miles from our destination, we somehow struck up a conversation and I discovered that he was a Jamaican. The rest of the time we talked about Caribbean stuff: regional politics, recent hurricane damages and the price of plantains and bauxite. On another instance, my cousin and I were taking his sister to the airport for her flight to Miami and a woman who looked like Florence Henderson heard us speaking Spanish and before long we were in a Spanish-language conversation talking about the problems of guerillas in Peru (which is where she was from) and what it may mean for the Dominican Republic. On yet another a Puerto Rican mechanic (well, he looked Puerto Rican, didn't he?) came up to me and asked me if I could tell him where the "brothers" hang out.

And who (and what???) was that lady in the latest "Mission Impossible" movie starring opposite Tom Cruise?

It's gotten so bad (good, really) that I have begun to feel a certain amount of pity for those whose every waking hour is spent trying to eyeball people and place them in convenient categories before getting to know what's inside their souls.

I mean, it was different in the past. In the middle of the last century, there was a myth (loosely corresponding to reality) which had a population which was 85+% "white" confronting a 10% "black" population. The rest of the people -- a tiny "Hispanic" group, a minuscule "Indian" group and a microscopic "Asian" group -- were bystanders to the "big dance": the slugfest between "black" and "white".

Oh, alas! Eyeballing was so much simpler then!

William Javier Nelson, Ph.D.


Also of interest by William Javier Nelson:


EMAIL
ARCHIVES


©2001 all rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part prohibited without
the express written consent of Interracial Voice.